Exclusion Screening

Maximize your performance with

Verify Everything. Miss Nothing.

One-stop portal to identify and resolve compliance screening issues – fast!

STREAMLINE VERIFY IS THE FUTURE OF COMPLIANCE

Our API integration offers a faster, more efficient way to execute Exclusion Screening and Credential Management

Recent OIG Penalties & Affirmative Exclusions

Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta Agreed to Pay $20,000 for Allegedly Violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law by Employing an Excluded Individual

After it self-disclosed conduct to OIG, Dignity Health d/b/a Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta (Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta), California, agreed to pay $20,000 for allegedly violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. OIG alleged that Mercy Medical Center Mt. Shasta employed an individual that it knew or should have known was excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.

HH Medstar Health Agreed to Pay $20,000 for Allegedly Violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law by Employing an Excluded Individual

After it self-disclosed conduct to OIG, HH Medstar Health, Inc. (HH Medstar), Maryland, agreed to pay $20,000 for allegedly violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. OIG alleged that HH Medstar employed an individual that it knew or should have known was excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.

Newco Hatfield Medical Group Agreed to Pay $85,000 for Allegedly Violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law by Employing an Excluded Individual

After it self-disclosed conduct to OIG, Newco Hatfield Medical Group, PLLC (Newco), Arizona, agreed to pay $85,608.95 for allegedly violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. OIG alleged that Newco employed an individual that it knew or should have known was excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.

PA Peterson at the Citadel Agreed to Pay $20,000 for Allegedly Violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law by Employing an Excluded Individual

After it self-disclosed conduct to OIG, PA Peterson at the Citadel, LLC (Peterson), Illinois, agreed to pay $20,000 for allegedly violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law. OIG alleged that Peterson employed an individual that it knew or should have known was excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.

Trusted by over 10,000 establishments

Learn why over 10,000 establishments have trusted us to streamline their workflow for more than a decade.

Contact us

635 Duquesne Boulevard Brick Township, NJ 08723

    Understanding OIG Exclusions

    OIG Exclusions Screening Process

    Exclusion FAQS

    Quick OIG Exclusion Basics

    Employing Excluded Individuals

    Consequences to Employing an Excluded Individual

    OIG Compliance Law

    Laws and Publications on OIG Compliance

    More Compliance Resources

    Our Culture

    We build the best, so you can perform at your best.

    Trusted for Good Reason

    • ✓ Guaranteed accurate
    • ✓ Certified Secure
    • ✓ Audit Proof
    • ✓ Feature-rich reporting
    • ✓ Round the clock real-time-data
    • ✓ Processing fully automated

    Security First

    • ✓ Cloud hosted
    • ✓ Encrypted data
    • ✓ Real-time backups

    Trusted for Accuracy

    • ✓ Physical security
    • ✓ Restricted access
    • ✓ Single sign-on
    • ✓ Password security
    • ✓ Certified secure
    • ✓ Cross checking

    HEALTHCARE ESTABLISHMENTS NATIONWIDE COUNT ON STREAMLINE VERIFY

    5

    60%

    Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program

    5

    10K

    Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide

    5

    2011

    Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011

    5

    24X

    Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data