The OIG Goes Digging

Posted by Frank Strafford on December 2, 2014 in Industry News,

It was completely unexpected.

One fine day in March, Texas-based corporation Daybreak Venture, LLC, received a letter stating that excluded individuals had been discovered amongst its employee rosters.  Seven months later, the episode closed with a fine of $357,341.96.

Daybreak is a reputable skilled nursing facility chain, encompassing 74 member facilities.  The company database includes some 50,000 employees and 16,000 vendors, culled over the course of the corporation’s history.  The OIG alleged that five facilities had each employed one individual who was excluded from participating in any Federal health care programs; and that these facilities had, in turn, billed Federal health care programs for items or services provided by the excluded individuals.

None of the names listed in the fateful letter belonged to current employees.  Each and every one was a former employee, who was no longer with the company.

Digg

What prompted Washington to begin digging up records of years’ old bills?  The official OIG news release says that the excluded individuals were identified through a ‘data analysis project initiated by the OIG’s Office of Audit Services’; but the details of this project are shrouded in mystery, leaving facility owners with no way to gauge the scope of this project, and – most importantly – no way to figure out whether or not they are soon to be hit with the same.

While the OIG left no hint as to which arm of the OIG instigated the investigation, three OIG offices had a hand in finalizing the settlement: the Office of Investigations, Office of Audit Services, and Office of Counsel.  Clearly, the OIG means business.

What will be next for facilities?  Nobody knows.  But the knowledge that the OIG will be combing through ancient billing histories is likely to prompt many COOs to rethink their exclusion screening protocols.

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Frank Strafford

About Frank Strafford

Related Articles

Last Name Null Causing Database Confusion

October 10, 2018

Databases have long had difficulty displaying the name Null. That is because database systems are wired to read this as a value or more accurately, the non-value “null”. It is deeply ingrained in ...

How much does it cost to ...

January 21, 2015

How much does it cost to search the Social Security Death Master File?  Here is a quick overview of your options. Some corporations conduct regular DMF searches as good compliance protocol; others...

New Hampshire and Delaware Exclusion State ...

May 22, 2019

Healthcare organizations are now able to screen against the state exclusion databases of both New Hampshire and Delaware. They are the latest addition to Streamline Verify’s database portfolio. This...

Understanding OIG Exclusions

OIG Exclusions Screening Process

Exclusion FAQS

Quick OIG Exclusion Basics

Employing Excluded Individuals

Consequences to Employing an Excluded Individual

OIG Compliance Law

Laws and Publications on OIG Compliance

Our Culture Icon Small

Our Culture

We build the best, so you can perform at your best.

Trusted for Good Reason

  • ✓ Guaranteed accurate
  • ✓ Certified Secure
  • ✓ Audit Proof
  • ✓ Feature-rich reporting
  • ✓ Round the clock real-time-data
  • ✓ Processing fully automated

Security First

  • ✓ Cloud hosted
  • ✓ Encrypted data
  • ✓ Real-time backups

Trusted for Accuracy

  • ✓ Physical security
  • ✓ Restricted access
  • ✓ Single sign-on
  • ✓ Password security
  • ✓ Certified secure
  • ✓ Cross checking

HEALTHCARE ESTABLISHMENTS NATIONWIDE COUNT ON STREAMLINE VERIFY

5

60%

Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program

5

10K

Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide

5

2011

Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011

5

24X

Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data

AICP SOC Compliance Logo
HIPAA Compliance Logo