Understanding Which Excluded Employees & Entities Are Problematic

Posted by Frank Strafford on September 19, 2017 in Exclusions,

When is an Excluded Individual or Entity Problematic?

According to federal law, the OIG is legally permitted to enforce CMP (Civil Monetary Penalties) upon any individual or entity which breaches their regulations. Regulations governing the practice and employment of excluded parties are particularly weighty in the eyes of the OIG and carry some of the most significant penalties as a result. In fact, organizations that employ or otherwise work with excluded parties subject themselves to fines between $10,000 and $25,000 for each item within a violation.

As a major violation of OIG regulation that can cause significant financial loss to all parties involved, it is important to understand the situations in which excluded individuals or entities will subject an organization to the OIG fines and which will not.

 These Excluded Types Are Obviously Problematic

Obviously, any excluded individual or entity (that is, anyone listed on the OIG exclusion list) that furnishes direct items or services to a federal healthcare beneficiary will force an employer to incur penalties under the OIG federal regulations. This includes anyone who provides supplies, lab services, or other medical services such as doctors, nurses, and other healthcare services to any federal healthcare program beneficiary. Most providers understand this clearly and are on the lookout to ensure these individuals/entities are not in their employment.

Excluded Types That You May Not Have Thought Of

However, the prohibitions go beyond the expected scope of direct patient care. These services include less obvious tasks done within the framework of a hospital, nursing home, healthcare organization, hospice, or at-home care by an excluded entity. This includes:

  • Administrative or managerial services
  • Surgical equipment and trays preparation
  • Treatment plan review or preparation
  • Pharmacists or pharmaceutical aides who input information about the prescriptions or have any interaction with the prescriptions at all
  • Ambulatory or other transportation services including drivers, dispatchers, and managers

Many Providers Have Overlooked These Excluded Types

The above mentioned sanctions are understandable, even if somewhat unexpected. However, even employees or vendors whose services are not directly related to patient care are bound by these restrictions, as are the organizations employing them. The following exclusion types may surprise many employers and may easily be overlooked during a screening process. Surprisingly, services rendered that would violate OIG exclusion laws, and therefore make an organization liable for CMPs include:

  • Managers and administrators whose roles and duties are not directly and separately billed for
  • CEOs, CFOs, directors of human resources, health information managers, office managers within private physician practices, and others who work for an organization that bills a federal healthcare program for their items or services
  • Tech support
  • Billing and accounting services or claims processors that will be reimbursed via the federal healthcare program (directly or indirectly)
  • Training services
  • Human resources managers

And anyone else who is involved in the selling, delivery, or restocking of medical equipment, including medical devices that will be claimed for reimbursement under federal healthcare programs could make an organization liable to CMPs.

Additionally, the full restrictions of the OIG law apply to an excluded individual or entity who works directly or indirectly for an organization under contractual agreement that is paid directly by a federal healthcare program. Again, it is irrelevant if the excluded party is rendering actual medical and first-hand patient care or simply working in an administrative or office position such as updating records, secretarial duties, or stocking supplies.

When is Exclusion Employment Allowed?

Believe it or not, there are scenarios when excluded individuals are not problematic.

The most basic situation would be if the patient is not a federal healthcare beneficiary. In such a case, an excluded individual would be able to provide services to the patient since the provider would not be compensated with federal dollars.

Surprisingly, an excluded individual may refer a provider or service to a federal healthcare beneficiary as long as the excluded individual does not service the patient or prescribe any prescriptions.

There are cases when the OIG actually gives complete waivers to excluded individuals or entities for special circumstances. A complete list of those receiving waivers can be seen here oig.hhs.gov/exclusions/waivers.asp.

It is important to have proper screening procedures in place for all employees. This will also help an employer in the event that they inadvertently employed as an excluded party.

About Frank Strafford

About Frank Strafford

Related Articles

HCCA’s 2017 Compliance Institute, a Smashing ...

April 6, 2017

With close to three thousand attendants, the HCCA Compliance Institute 2017 kicked off another successful summit and reached a wider audience than we’ve ever seen before. Those numbers also highligh...

The NPI Registry and Why It ...

December 12, 2016

Technological Numbers What is an NPI Number? National Provider Identifiers (NPIs) were created to ensure for accuracy and efficiency in the health care system when it comes to transmitting informati...

A New Use for the National ...

March 15, 2021

A Brief History of the NPI and NPPES As defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the National Provider Identifier (NPI) is a unique 10-digit, intelligence-free identificatio...