CMS Gains New Exclusion Authority. Does Your Compliance Workflow Need to Change?

Posted by Joe Stefansky on October 21, 2026 in CMS,

CMS can now directly impose certain provider exclusions. Here’s what healthcare compliance teams need to know—and what remains unanswered.

On October 14, 2026, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officially delegated new exclusion authority to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Under this delegation, CMS can now directly exercise permissive exclusion authority under Section 1128(b) of the Social Security Act, rather than relying exclusively on the existing authority of the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG).

The change is effective immediately.

But for healthcare compliance officers responsible for exclusion screening, the bigger question is whether this development requires any changes to their current processes.

First, What Actually Changed?

The change expands who can exercise federal exclusion authority, not the underlying grounds for exclusion.

CMS now has a direct role in imposing certain exclusions, while OIG retains its existing authority.

HHS says the move is intended to streamline enforcement by allowing CMS to handle exclusion determinations more directly, using its existing investigative and program oversight capabilities.

This could eventually lead to more exclusion activity or faster enforcement decisions, although neither outcome has been confirmed.

Does This Change Your Screening Requirements Today?

Not based on the delegation notice alone.

The October 14 announcement does not establish:

  • New exclusion screening frequency requirements.
  • Additional screening databases that healthcare organizations must immediately check.
  • New reporting obligations or compliance deadlines.

Organizations should continue their established exclusion screening procedures in accordance with existing requirements.

However, the delegation introduces an important question about how CMS-issued exclusions will be communicated and captured within existing screening processes.

    Three Developments Compliance Teams Should Watch

    1. Where Will CMS-Issued Exclusions Appear?

    OIG currently maintains the List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE), while CMS maintains its separate Preclusion List.

    With CMS now authorized to issue permissive exclusions directly, will those actions be reflected in the existing LEIE database, communicated through a different mechanism, or require additional monitoring?

    The delegation notice doesn’t specify.

    What to watch: Future CMS and OIG guidance clarifying how newly issued exclusions will be published and made available for screening.

    2. Could Exclusion Activity Increase?

    CMS now has the authority to pursue certain exclusion actions directly, potentially creating an additional path for federal enforcement.

    Whether this results in greater exclusion volume, faster determinations, or different enforcement priorities remains to be seen.

    What to watch: Changes in exclusion activity, CMS enforcement announcements, and any emerging patterns in the types of cases being pursued.

    3. Will Existing Screening Workflows Need Adjustments?

    If CMS introduces additional exclusion notifications, data feeds, or reporting mechanisms, compliance teams may eventually need to revisit their screening coverage.

    That could mean confirming that their screening services and internal processes capture any newly relevant sources.

    What to watch: Official implementation guidance that clarifies where CMS-issued exclusions will be recorded and whether additional screening steps are necessary.

    The Bottom Line

    No immediate workflow overhaul is called for by this announcement. But it’s a development worth keeping on the compliance radar.

    CMS has gained an additional enforcement capability, and the operational implications are still taking shape.

    For now, compliance teams should maintain their existing screening protocols, monitor CMS and OIG announcements, and be prepared to assess any changes to the way exclusion information becomes available.

    The key question moving forward isn’t whether exclusion screening remains necessary.

    It’s whether the sources and processes organizations rely on today will continue to provide complete visibility as CMS begins exercising its new authority.


    Primary source: Federal Register — Statement of Delegation of Authority, October 14, 2026

    About Joe Stefansky

    About Joe Stefansky

    Joe Stefansky has a keen sense of business opportunities in complex problems, using technology to transform difficulty into efficiency. The CEO and founder of Streamline Verify specializes in solving compliance, legal and administrative issues through intuitively designed software that reduces costs and saves time.

    Related Articles

    Exclusions Due to Overpayments – Cautionary Tales

    October 25, 2021

    While it seems unlikely that an organization’s mail management can result in exclusion from a federally funded program, many errors seem to be causing major headaches for well-intentioned, high- per...

    OIG Updated Its Exclusion List Twice ...

    August 24, 2018

    This month a second update was made on the List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE). The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) confirmed thi...

    New NTIS Guidelines Limit Access To ...

    April 28, 2017

    Symbol of internet security with binary character hand and padlock The Importance of the Death Master File Ghosting, or stealing the identity of a deceased individual is one of the oldest form...

    Understanding OIG Exclusions

    OIG Exclusions Screening Process

    Exclusion FAQS

    Quick OIG Exclusion Basics

    Employing Excluded Individuals

    Consequences to Employing an Excluded Individual

    OIG Compliance Law

    Laws and Publications on OIG Compliance

    Our Culture Icon Small

    Blog

    Stay ahead of healthcare compliance - updates that matter.

    Ask Me Anything

    Clear answers. Cleaner compliance.

    Exclusion Compliance

    Understand exclusions. Reduce risk.

    Security First

    • ✓ Cloud hosted
    • ✓ Encrypted data
    • ✓ Real-time backups

    Trusted for Accuracy

    • ✓ Physical security
    • ✓ Restricted access
    • ✓ Single sign-on
    • ✓ Password security
    • ✓ Certified secure
    • ✓ Cross checking

    HEALTHCARE ESTABLISHMENTS NATIONWIDE COUNT ON STREAMLINE VERIFY

    5

    60%

    Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program

    5

    10K

    Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide

    5

    2011

    Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011

    5

    24X

    Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data

    AICP SOC Compliance Logo
    HIPAA Compliance Logo
    Our Culture Icon Small

    Our Culture

    We build the best, so you can perform at your best.

    Trusted for Good Reason

    • ✓ Guaranteed accurate
    • ✓ Certified Secure
    • ✓ Audit Proof
    • ✓ Feature-rich reporting
    • ✓ Round the clock real-time-data
    • ✓ Processing fully automated

    Security First

    • ✓ Cloud hosted
    • ✓ Encrypted data
    • ✓ Real-time backups

    Trusted for Accuracy

    • ✓ Physical security
    • ✓ Restricted access
    • ✓ Single sign-on
    • ✓ Password security
    • ✓ Certified secure
    • ✓ Cross checking

    HEALTHCARE ESTABLISHMENTS NATIONWIDE COUNT ON STREAMLINE VERIFY

    5

    60%

    Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program

    5

    10K

    Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide

    5

    2011

    Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011

    5

    24X

    Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data

    AICP SOC Compliance Logo
    HIPAA Compliance Logo