Minnesota Statute Mandates Monthly State Exclusion List Checks

Posted by Steven Grossman on August 1, 2019 in Uncategorized,

Healthcare providers are now required by law to screen the Minnesota Healthcare Programs (MHCP) Exclusion List on a monthly basis. The State legislature amended certain subdivisions of the Minnesota Statutes which went into effect August 1, 2019. Until now the MHCP Manual only included a suggestion to perform periodic checks to avoid non-compliance. Making this a binding law has numerous serious consequences which healthcare organizations in Minnesota need to be made aware of.

The Statute

By virtue of the addition of Minnesota Statutes 2018, (Sec. 115, subdivision 3, section 256B.064):

(b) The vendor must check the exclusion list on a monthly basis and document the date and time the exclusion list was checked and the name and title of the person who checked the exclusion list. The vendor must immediately terminate payments to an individual or entity on the exclusion list.

Vendors are prohibited to make payments to any excluded entity or individual. Failure to do so would merit certain penalties pursuant to part (d) of subdivision 3. Among them are:

  • Imposition of “monetary recovery and sanctions”, which are detailed under subdivision 2, Sec. 114. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 256B.064;
  • A Civil Monetary Penalty of up to $25,000 for every violation or transaction involving an excluded party;
  • Any “other fines or penalties allowed by law

Whenever vendors confirm the excluded status of an individual or entity, they must immediately clarify if the respective party had any involvement with any of their Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries. No further transactions can be made with individuals or entities that provide direct or indirect patient care. The requirement to do so extends to services rendered through mere instructions of these types of excluded parties. Vendors must promptly terminate their relationships with such excluded individuals or entities lest they be further penalized for being in open violation of the amended Minnesota Statute.

Vendors seeking to participate or enroll in the MHCP health programs must diligently screen MHCP’s Excluded Group and Individual Providers lists. This is in addition to the OIG’s List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE). It would be prudent to include other federal and state databases in the exclusions search as well.

Breaking Down The Numbers

The MHCP Excluded Providers lists have a combined total of 952 exclusions. There are 189 Excluded Group Providers and 763 Excluded Individual Providers confirmed as of July 1, 2019. This number is only set to grow as the MHCP updates its database monthly.

Validating a potential exclusion is different among states. There are some which provide immediate verification through an online portal and inputting a Social Security Number (SSN). Others will require an email inquiry instead of an online portal. Due diligence can be met by making such inquiry. The State of Minnesota however, as noted on their website, requires concerned parties to call them when verifying a possible concern.

Concerned vendors must call the MHCP Provider Call Center. Contacting 6514312700 or 8003665411 will help verify if the entity or individual they are dealing with is excluded. A call center representative will need either of the following details though could request for additional information:

  • Employer Identification Number (EIN) or Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN)
  • SSN
  • Date of birth (DOB)

Minimize the Workload

Any health compliance officer knows well how tedious exclusion screening can be under any circumstance. Now that its required by law every month, including the obligation to capture the date and time it was checked, ensuring screening accuracy can really get challenging. Using an automated exclusion screening software such as Streamline Verify provides the technology to ensure accurate checks on a consistent basis. Being that the MHCP only offers phone in verification when trying to resolve a match, exclusion screening software’s capability of storing note details has been a real boon for many.

Please refer to this resource for more helpful information on OIG Exclusion Screening.

About Steven Grossman

About Steven Grossman

Related Articles

Why They Self Disclosed

July 20, 2015

Of all the penalties issued this year by the OIG in response to healthcare organizations that employed excluded individuals, all but three were the result of self-disclosures. Which kind of makes you...

OIG Semiannual Report to Congress Includes ...

December 10, 2017

The HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) had a busy and fruitful six months from April to September of 2017, according to the Fall 2017 OIG semiannual report to Congress. The Health and Human Ser...

Why One Doctor Just Ended Up ...

March 9, 2015

Anyone working in the field of healthcare human resources should understand the role of the Office of the Inspector General in both investigating fraud related to federal health care programs and pena...

Understanding OIG Exclusions

OIG Exclusions Screening Process

Exclusion FAQS

Quick OIG Exclusion Basics

Employing Excluded Individuals

Consequences to Employing an Excluded Individual

OIG Compliance Law

Laws and Publications on OIG Compliance

More Compliance Resources

About Us

Industry leader Streamline Verify has been forging new paths in Exclusion Screening.

Trusted for Good Reason

  • ✓ Guaranteed accurate
  • ✓ Certified Secure
  • ✓ Audit Proof
  • ✓ Feature-rich reporting
  • ✓ Round the clock real-time-data
  • ✓ Processing fully automated

Security First

  • ✓ Cloud hosted
  • ✓ Encrypted data
  • ✓ Real-time backups

Trusted for Accuracy

  • ✓ Physical security
  • ✓ Restricted access
  • ✓ Single sign-on
  • ✓ Password security
  • ✓ Certified secure
  • ✓ Cross checking




Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program



Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide



Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011



Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data